When I was in college I had a philosophy professor who always used the piece of chalk in his hand to illustrate the concept that he was teaching. I remember the particular brand of chalk - AN DU SEPTIC - because the professor always pointed out the indented letters on the side of the piece that he was holding and often voiced his mystification about what the brand-name meant. (He was a language philosopher). And it really was good chalk. When I became a graduate student and began to teach, I used the same brand of chalk and it was far superior to the chalk that the institution where I now teach uses. It didn't break, create dust, and it lasted a long time. Perhaps the crumbly, dusty chalk today is a result of budget cuts, or maybe they found that an ingredient in AN DU SEPTIC chalk was a carcinogen or something.
Anyway, I remember once when my professor defended the thesis that nouns were non-existent. Of course, he used the chalk as an example. He asked his students to tell him what the piece of chalk in his hand was if one subtracted all the adjectives from it. "It's certainly not the whiteness of this piece of AN DU SEPTIC chalk that makes it chalk because we know that chalk can come in many colors," he said. "It's not the fact that this is cylindrical that makes it chalk; we can imagine manufacturing chalk in many different shapes: spherical, cubic, . . ." He would go through all the possible attributes of chalk and never get to its essence. So the professor would conclude, "Therefore, nouns are, in fact, a fiction. All that we have are adjectives."
To get an idea of Brahman, invert my professor's argument. Hindu culture, remember, rejects the existence of everything that can be experienced physically or conceptualized intellectually. Also, remember that the Hindu believes that everything is essentially Brahman and the appearances (the "adjectives" to use my professor's term) are distractions from reality. So when the professor told us that he had proved the non-existence of nouns, to the Hindu, he proved that everything that can be named - you, me, trees, desks, and even AN DU SEPTIC chalk - is, essentially, Brahman.
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
hindu thinking on the nature of reality and brahman
Labels:
buddhism,
buddhists,
chalk,
hindu,
indian religion,
nature of reality
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
the zen circle of zen buddhism or buddhism is one of its main symbols and is also a bit of a yin yang symbol as well. as you can see from th...
-
Mazu Daoyi "Daji" (709-88) After Huineng, Mazu is the most famous of the ancient Chinese Zen masters. Three of the traditionally ...
-
english translations of buddhist texts Abhidharma Storehouse Treatise 阿毘達磨倶舎論 Acclamation of the Scriptural Teaching 顯揚聖教論 Accomplishing All...
-
Japan Kyoto Daitoku Ji Zen Buddhist Temple Zuiho In Sorin Ohtomo Zen Rock Garden. lovely picture of what a zen buddhist rock garden looks li...
-
zen buddhist pictures for meditation and spiritual relaxation, this is a bit of a montage of images with the buddhist in mind and these imag...
-
A mantra is a tool for the mind. The suffix "-tra" designates a tool in Sanskrit. Take the word khanitra. Khan means dig. So a kha...
-
sun tzu does use zen like simplicity but is brutal with his actions, so is sun tzu zen like or buddhist or just using some buddhist techniqu...
-
well when doing zen buddhist meditation or in a deep state of meditation or relaxation this picture below shows some of the vibrations and f...
-
"A family is a place where minds come in contact with one another. If these minds love one another the home will be as beautiful as a f...
-
Buddhism 2013 to say we will be still around in 2013 and the world will not have ended in 2012, or at the very least the energy and the soul...
No comments:
Post a Comment